The teachings of the Angel

Occam's razor:

Let’s start first with a bit of general knowledge: Occam's razor principle (inference) is a type of reasoning that involves inferring probable causes for an observed fact. In other words, it consists of establishing the most likely cause of a noted fact as a working hypothesis (Occam's razor). For example, medical diagnoses are based on inference.

Indeed, between science (math) and philosophy (concepts), which seeks to make sense of everything, lies inference. It unifies the two by attempting to establish the most scientifically plausible meaning of an observed phenomenon as a working hypothesis (Occam's razor). In medicine, this is called a diagnosis. However, with science and its mathematics, this is called an incompatibility. Nevertheless, in science, we wonder why there are no conclusive results with dark matter, while with abductive inference, we can already explain it! Inference is a thought process based on the most probable causality (Occam's razor) and without mathematics (philosophy), but founded on scientific observation, which it cannot contradict, only interpret. According to quantum mechanics, the structure of the universe is composed of quantum fields whose geometry appears infinite. However, nothing is certain, as we are working in uncharted territory with numerous theories that contradict each other while evolving over time. To give an idea of ​​the value of these inferences, here is a small sample of relevant viewpoints that should provoke thought:

Structure of the universe (quantum fields):

The universe is composed of endless quantum fields. It’s a setting, not a scene. The setting reacts to the scene: an energy that arrives in the universe, 13.8 billion years ago, to ignite it. Thus the setting is loaded to the maximum of what it can contain as mass/energy potential. And it is this setting, thus the quantum fields, that will have to manage the energy that activates the cosmos. How is this management carried out? With an inflation of space, aka a Big Bang, where it is the space itself that expands at full speed.

The paradox of Olbers:

The paradox of Olbers speaks of a sky everywhere illuminated in reference to an unlimited static universe. However, we should not confuse size and statism. The universe's size is not known, but its evolution is: an eternal expansion results in the Big Freeze because of its flatness. Thus, if the size is unknown, the universe is nevertheless expansive, which eliminates the version of a static universe (Olbers' paradox).

The Olbers' paradox opposes in fact the vision of a static universe against an expansive one. The typical example is the static galactic bulbs (Olbers' paradox effect where light is from everywhere) in an expanding universe where gaps of empty spaces appear. So, bright points (statism) that deviate (expansive).

Geometry of the universe (flatness):

The geometry of the universe is a great question that has raised many questions. One is about the flatness of the universe, because according to observations, the universe defines itself as being flat. Why?

Quantum mechanics is counterintuitive: the emptyness does not exist, only quantum fields exist! They fill the entire universe infinitely. For this, the geometry of the universe must be platte! This allows energy to adapt to the environment in an infinite universe that extends forever. Thus, the universe is infinite but its information ages!

The laws of physics vs fundamental forces (EPR paradox) :

We easily confuse the laws of physics with fundamental forces since both are made up of math that governs the universe. However, even if math composes them, their priority is not the same. Thus, there are math and math! Math to define general rules, math to represent the environment and math to establish the consequences. So, when the pressure is greater than the resistance, the material breaks, it’s universal, but the way it breaks depends on the environment. Thus, the farewell of Casini on Saturn was a unique event quite different from a simple atmospheric re-entry on Earth. The way in which it was destroyed was equally unique. In conclusion, if the laws of physics are the same, the environment is not, which leads to different destinies for the same rules. The difference is the environment: it manages the fundamental forces at work; in the case of a white dwarf, it is electromagnetism that generates degenerative pressure, and in the case of a neutron star, it is the strong force. The forces not being the same, neither is the pressure! Thus, it is the environment (here gravity) that dictates the interactions of fundamental forces. Execpt gravity, which is unique, the forces express themselves through bosons that travel while the laws of physics do not travel, they are omnipresent.

So is the EPR paradox: a symmetric pair production of an attribute, the spin. Even though electromagnetism (a fundamental force) links entangled particles, it is the universal law of pair production that determines the spin. So, the travel depend on time while the spin depend on the interactions. As soon as this one focuses on a spin, the pair production requires the other spin to be made immediately.

Another exemple: as soon as mass is, gravity is too. One does not go without the other. So as soon as I have the mass of the sun, I can calculate its spatiotemporal deformations (geodesic) without the slightest delay thanks to Einstein. This is space: it does not travel, it deforms by extending or collapsing. Yet as soon as we travel in these gravitational curves, the movement must take into account the environment, thus the space-time that is distorted. Thus time enters the scene and the phenomenon is no longer immediate. Thus, if we do not need to take time into account to draw the spatiotemporal curvatures of the sun, we are obliged to take it into account when it comes to traveling in these curvatures!

In conclusion, one does not need time: it is the laws of physics that establish that all mass is accompanied by gravity and the other are the fundamental forces that reign over the interactions managing matter. This requires a movement of particles and therefore time comes into play.

Thus the laws of physics are universal while the fundamental forces are local.

The laws of physics do not depend on time but the fundamental forces do.

In short, matter can only obey the fundamental forces that depend on an environment itself managed by finely tuned laws of physics to allow a local (planet) flight of entropy. This one can reach peaks allowing the appearance of life.

Occam's razor's articles

This part is dedicated to research advances in which I participate through various publications: point of view debating on concepts. They give an idea about the nature of dark matter, black forces, spin and the origins of the Big Bang. This originates from the long research work to finalize volume I of the Teachings of the Angel, "The origins of matter".

Video's :

All of these discoveries come from my French book, which I have translated into English.

This volume explores the Dark Force, dark matter, and black holes, revealing the surprising complexity of the origin of matter. It explains the formation of galaxies from clouds, but also from supermassive black holes (quasars) thanks to dark matter. It also recounts the origin of the Milky Way, then the creation of the solar system. Next comes the story of the Earth and the Moon, with the arrival of water, comets, and meteors. This essay concludes with stories by Pascale Courtois, inspired by the book's teachings. Thus, young and old alike are entertained while enriching their knowledge and understanding.

How did the universe form? Many are looking for answers to this question. But these only happen in bits with scientific discoveries. Alas, between discovery and understanding, there is a long work. A work that is done here in order to explain the inexplicable. Thus this work teaches about the fundamental principles of the physical laws of the universe. It gives the point of view of general relativity about the Big Bang. However, this one is contradicted by quantum mechanics. The latter offers a completely different version of the beginnings of the universe, detailed here.