The teachings of the Angel
Black matter : an extraplotaion of pair production
This article has been published in various journals but is updated here.
It talks about theoretical particles that are wonderfully similar to dark matter.
These particles can be simulated by computer.
But the resources that it requires are outside my competence.
However, anyone can try to model them if they have the means !
References :
Journal of Space Exploration (tsijournals.com) :
https://www.tsijournals.com/articles/the-nature-of-black-matter-an-extrapolation-of-pair-creation.pdf
Journal of physics astronomy :
International Journal Of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT.ORG) :
The nature of black matter : an extrapolation of pair production :
Abstract :
Black matter is one of the greatest unknowns in the cosmos, despite being the most important gravitational component. Indeed, black matter is the most prevalent matter, and its bulk has an impact on the design of the universe. It has permitted the construction and preservation of cosmic structures. As a result, understanding the cosmos without knowing its properties is extremely difficult. However, it only reacts to gravity and not to the other fundamental forces. It is not a weak reaction, but rather the complete lack of direct reactivity with whole-number spin (energy) or half-integer spin (matter), even in our particle accelerators. Indeed, black matter is not only opaque to us because it lacks a measurable electromagnetic field, but it also exhibits no nuclear reaction at all. Finally, it appears to be able to influence only wide areas, implying that it lacks concentration. So the only thing we know about black matter is its non-properties, or what it does not do, which is react with our own fundamental forces (save gravity) and cover only enormous areas (big gravitational lenses). As a result, black matter remains a big mystery. There is, however, a solution if the problem is phrased differently.
Introduction :
Science can be done in a variety of ways, including observation, mathematics, thought experiments, and so on. However, history demonstrates that thought experiments can be used to direct research. So it was with Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr on quantum physics' hidden variables. Alain Aspect solved it by demonstrating the EPR paradox. So is science: it is always growing thanks to its pioneers! As a result, thought experiments are used as primary research in this case. The pair production with opposing energy is the starting point. These energies produce compounds with properties comparable to black matter! In this context, we extrapolate the pair production to uncover what could have attributes of energies that are diametrically opposed to ours, just as antimatter is diametrically opposed to matter. In summary, we extrapolate the half-integer spin conflict with the whole-number spin.
Literature Review :
Is the formation of pairs a recurring universal phenomena or merely a coincidence? In the case of a recurrent phenomena, this indicates that everything, including energies, is formed by pairs. To test the validity of such a model, we must reimagine the energies by envisioning what the properties of energies opposing ours may be. The first thought is that such energies would cancel each other out, rendering them ineffective, but then we realise that energy can take on the same quantum state in the same space-time (undifferentiated), so it does not fight but adds up. As we continue our investigation, we discover that such energies produce materials with properties comparable to black matter: it is unable to interact with our own forces or conventional matter, and it cannot collapse on itself. Finally, it has a big bulk on a global scale.
According to the theory of pair formation, all matter has an antimatter counterpart. Consequently, a quark and an electron are produced using a positron and an antiquark, respectively. In essence, the opposite of everything is generated. Yet, just as opposites' characteristics vary, so do their behaviors’. Thus, matter survived antimatter thanks to its asymmetry. These opposites are first generated fairly, nevertheless. Each North Pole is generated with its corresponding South Pole, each charge has its opposite and each polarity also has its corresponding inverted rotation. Even the EPR paradox is based on a pair production : a quantum entanglement. Therefore it is a recurrent phenomenon. Thus it appears that opposing pairs produced everything. I refer it as a type of universal equilibrium.
Discussion :
What about pair energy? It energy would then be doubled, but in the other direction. There should be two types of energy: positive and negative. However, because energy can take on the same quantum state in the same space-time (undifferentiated), these two forms might coexist without touching. In reality, energy does not clash; rather, it concentrates on matter. Thus, the only conflict with lightsabers exists in our imagination. Laser beams, in reality, do not stop at the end of a meter. The photon travels straight after being launched. It merely stops to contact the matter and cause it to react. As a result, lasers that intersect do not collide. They share the same space without any contact, therefore any interaction. They mix but they don't fight; instead, they add up! As a result, there is no annihilation of these two opposites. Thus, positive and negative energies coexist in the same world.
The force of gravity, on the other hand, is an exception: the Higgs' boson that begins the mass has a spin of zero, not a whole-number spin. Indeed, a spin zero has quite different features than a whole spin: the direction of the whole spin (vector) is important, whereas the orientation of the zero spin (scalar) has no significance. Therefore, as soon as quanta of energy ignites a field of fermion or antifermion, it also lits the Higgs' field, which gives a mass to whatever it is, matter or antimatter. As a result, we can conclude that this inversion of forces has no impact on any mass. To sum up, the inverse of gravity caused by mass is itself.
But what do the terms "positive" and "negative" energy mean? This means that what attracts on one side turns repellent on the other, despite the fact that these are the same energies as ours, namely electromagnetic and nuclear forces. In short, according to this idea, the black forces are basically our own energy forces that are inverted. These opposing energies, like ours, produce matters whose masses will follow Gravity automatically. However, these matters are only influenced by these opposing forces, not ours. Repulsive forces that speak of stuff spreading in space. For example, the powerful black nuclear force does not bind the black quarks together, but rather separates them.
As a result, Pauli's exclusion principle has no effect on these matters. This one prohibits material particles from sharing the same space. However, because these things have different properties, they can exist in the same space-time as ours. Moreover, since they do not react to our fundamental force, they are completely invisible and undetected to us. As a result, even if they covered our entire horizon, we would not be able to tell them apart! Except for their gravity, because they are still material forms, therefore half-integer spin. Because of these characteristics, they have a mass that can grow in response to energies such as kinetics.
These matters, being associated with repulsive forces, would reject each other violently. As a result, there would be no baryogenocide (matter annihilation) with baryogenesis (matter production). Because, with our forces, matter clashes with antimatter, and only a small percentage of matter remains. This surviving residue is what makes up our observable cosmos. However, these matters, repelling one another, there is no conflict because everyone is fleeing. As a result of these matters not interacting with one another, matter and antimatter coexist peacefully. That would mean that the number of these particles is far greater than ours. Furthermore, owing of the repelling forces, these substances would never collapse on themselves. As a result, the cosmos would not be dragged into a massive black hole due to its mass. On the contrary, they would be fluid and impalpable while, due of their great quantity, being everywhere.
These matters would prefer to follow a non-repulsive mass. So, a mass that does not react with their own forces. In short, they would prefer to follow our matter rather than theirs and thus follow all these gravitational fields. Fields that they would amplify with their own mass. And because of the large amount of these matters with their antimatters, these fields would be very broad. Doesn’t that remind you of something? But yes, the ghost gravity! In other words, we are talking about black matter! Black matter, a simple extrapolation of the pair production starting with energy. Interesting, isn’t it?
Similarly, these particles also react with the effect of vacuum, a quantum vacuum that engages a pressure. With our matter, the vacuum pressure is minute, but with practise on repelling particles, it grows considerably stronger. Because the black strong force and electromagnetism are repulsive, they exert maximal pressure on the quantum vacuum. The entire thought produces a universally repellent field that will oppose gravity. Is there anything else it reminds you of? But, perhaps, the universal expansion? If that is the case, this spread of space depends on the density of the universe. A dense universe (full of attraction due to gravity) only engages a thin expansion while an empty universe (leaking gravity) engages a faster expansion. This means that the expansion of the universe is accelerating with time, especially where gravity is weak, as observed.
Going further, we can also consider electromagnetism which is repulsive between the same charges. In this case, an inversion of the fundamental forces gives an attractive effect between the same charges. Thus the black leptons could attract between the same charges and repel between different charges. Therefore the black electrons repel the black positrons but associate with each other and vice versa for the black positrons. Considering the incredible mass of black matter, such a disposition would lead to a collapse of its leptons into extremely massive black holes. The smallest would be intermediate but most would be super massive black holes. Therefore, quasars would be the first formation of the cosmos and would be at the origin of a very mature universe: giant galaxies would have formed very early! This is evidenced by the observations of James Webb.
Findings :
Thus, by extrapolating the pair production, we can discover a very odd stuff with features that appear to correspond to black matter. Similarly, some properties of this hypothetical matter can be anticipated and confirmed for black matter. As a result, this theory speaks about particles that have no interaction with our fundamental forces (save gravity). The question is whether the black matter we're looking for reacts "little" (scientists are usually cautious) or not at all?
Because it is a quantum fusion, the sun, for example, combines only a few ions. As a result, only the exception fuses, not the mass. So the sun has been shining for a very long time and will continue to do so for billions of years. However, only a small amount of mass is transformed into energy in this fusion. As a result, the sun beams "little" with "little"... a massive mass! This limitless number of particles multiplies the likelihood of combining, causing the sun to shine brightly.
It is even believed that black matter is abundant, as it is responsible for the majority of the universe's gravity. Thus, reacting a "little" with a "little" bit, with all this mass, must inevitably result in consequences, even if they are minor, like neutrinos. The only effects observed, however, are gravitational and non-energetic in nature. As a result, the absence of any interaction leads to this black matter being utterly insensitive to our matter and energetic forces. This supports my theory.
Conclusion :
In this cosmos, everything is formed by pairs. It's not a coincidence; it's a result of physical principles. They are not local, they are the same everywhere in the cosmos (universal). Thus, each North Pole has a South Pole, each spin has an opposite rotation, each particle has an antiparticle, and each energy has an opponent. The only thing that seems unique is the space itself! A space-time that reacts to gravity and is shared by all fermions. Pair formation is a random, equidistant, immediate, and global occurrence.
Demonstration :
This theory offers enough arguments to continue the research through simulations that are beyond my reach. Simulations that show particles obeying dark strong nuclear force (taking into account its interactions, in other words, only its repulsive effects) and gravity. Allow everything to simmer before adding a neutral mass (the Milky Way galaxy). Examine what causes all of the movements. They will, in my opinion, all follow the neutral mass and add their own mass along the way (explaining the gravity of every location in the galaxy). If this is the case, the simulation is worthy of a Nobel Prize because whomever created it has also demonstrated the existence of black matter! Best wishes to these knowledge explorers.
Conflict of interest :
This theory is related to a book : “The origin of matter”. This book is a product of a French encyclopedia named “Les Enseignements de l’Ange”. This collection has a lot of theories, including the beginning of life in the second tome (Les origines de la vie). So, there is conflict of interest: being right makes sales while being wrong makes idiots! This can lead to human blunders. This is why we must exercise caution: because conflict is unavoidable, information can only be validated if it is confirmed by a computer simulation.
The debate :
Science is strange: we make extraordinary discoveries but since we do not understand them, we often miss out on little wonders. Here is an example: the pair production.
References :
Zavala J, Lovell MR, Vogelsberger M, Burger JD. Diverse black matter density at sub-kiloparsec scales in Milky Way satellites: Implications for the nature of black matter. Phys. Rev. D 100, 063007 (2019)
Benito M, Criado JC, Hütsi G, Raidal M, Veermäe H. Implications of Milky Way substructures for the nature of black matter. Physical Review D 101, 103023 (2020)
Beltran M, Hooper D, Kolb EW, Krusberg ZA, Tait TM. Maverick black matter at colliders. Journal of High Energy Physics 1009:037, 2010
Metcalf RB, Silk J. A Fundamental test of the nature of black matter. The Astrophysical Journal May 1999 Volume 519, Number 1
Post:
The nature of black matter : an extrapolation of pair creation :
International Journal Of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT.ORG) :
https://ijcrt.org/viewfulltext.php?&p_id=IJCRT2312351
Journal of Space Exploration (tsijournals.com) :
https://www.tsijournals.com/articles/the-nature-of-black-matter-an-extrapolation-of-pair-creation.pdf
Journal of physics astronomy :
These informations come from this book : the evolution, part 1 : the origin of matter.
Available !